Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorBaş, Dilşat
dc.contributor.authorArıbal, Mustafa Erkin
dc.contributor.authorVardareli, Erkan
dc.contributor.authorSönmez, Özlem
dc.contributor.authorOyan, Başak
dc.contributor.authorÖzden, Burcu Çelet
dc.contributor.authorSonkaya, Alper
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-12T07:12:21Z
dc.date.available2023-01-12T07:12:21Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.citationBaş, D., Arıbal, M. E., Vardareli, E., Sönmez, Ö., Oyan, B., Özden, B. Ç., & Sonkaya, A. (2022). Validation of bioelectrical impedance analysis in the evaluation of body composition in patients with breast cancer. Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 10.1002/ncp.10947en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ncp.10947
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12941/109
dc.description.abstractBackground:The evaluation of body composition is an essential parameterfor preventing obesity and sarcopenic obesity, which are prognostic factors inbreast cancer. This study aims to validate the bioelectrical impedance analysis(BIA) of women who are breast cancer survivors by using the dual‐energyx‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurement method.Methods:This validation study included 104 women without metastasisbetween 32 and 72 years old (mean 47.03 ± 8.59) whose treatment wascompleted 6 months prior. Body composition analysis was performedsequentially using both measurements and when participants were hungry.Results:Meaningful differences were found in fat‐free mass (FFM)(BIA: 46.57 ± 5.54 kg; DXA: 41.06 ± 5.11 kg), body fat percentage (%BF)(BIA: 34.28% ± 6.24%; DXA: 43.91% ± 5.58%), body fat mass (FM) (BIA:25.37 ± 8.84 kg; DXA: 31.24 ± 9.09 kg), and lean soft tissue mass (LSTM) (BIA:4.42 ± 5.66 kg; DXA: 38.75 ± 4.98 kg) (P< 0.001). Powerful associations forbody FM and strong associations for other parameters were seen. A constantand/or proportional error was found between the two devices within thedirection of strong and solid components. Compared with DXA, the BIAmeasurement gives a lower estimate of %BF and FM and a higher estimate ofLSTM and FFM.Conclusions:By the mathematical relationship between the two measure-ment methods, it seems possible to adapt the body composition parametersobtained from BIA of patients with breast cancer to DXA results. In the future,there will be a need to evaluate these two devices with more extensive studies.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Inc.en_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1002/ncp.10947en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBioelectrical impedance analysisen_US
dc.subjectBody compositionen_US
dc.subjectBreast canceren_US
dc.subjectDual‐energy x‐rayabsorptiometryen_US
dc.subjectSarcopeniaen_US
dc.titleValidation of bioelectrical impedance analysis in the evaluation of body composition in patients with breast canceren_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.authoridDilşat Baş / 0000-0002-2991-7774
dc.departmentFakülteler, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Beslenme ve Diyetetik Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorBaş, Dilşat
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.endpage13en_US
dc.relation.journalNutrition in Clinical Practiceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster