Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorYıldırım, Erkan
dc.contributor.authorKılıçkan, Levent
dc.contributor.authorAksoy, Süleyman Hilmi
dc.contributor.authorGözüküçük, Ramazan
dc.contributor.authorKılıç, Hasan Hüseyin
dc.contributor.authorTomak, Yakup
dc.contributor.authorDalkılıç, Orhan
dc.contributor.authorTanboğa, İbrahim Halil
dc.contributor.authorKılıçkan, Fevzi Duhan Berkan
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-16T12:17:28Z
dc.date.available2023-03-16T12:17:28Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.citationYildirim, E., Kilickan, L., Aksoy, S. H., Gozukucuk, R., Kilic, H. H., Tomak, Y., Dalkilic, O., Tanboga, I. H., & Kilickan, F. D. B. (2023). Does the variant positivity and negativity affect the clinical course in COVID-19?: A cohort study. Medicine, 102(9), e33132. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000033132en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033132
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12941/123
dc.description.abstractThe primary aim of the current study is to analyze the clinical, laboratory, and demographic data comparing the patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) admitted to our intensive care unit before and after the UK variant was first diagnosed in December 2020. The secondary objective was to describe a treatment approach for COVID-19. Between Mar 12, 2020, and Jun 22, 2021, 159 patients with COVID-19 were allocated into 2 groups: the variant negative group (77 patients before December 2020) and the variant positive group (82 patients after December 2020). The statistical analyses included early and late complications, demographic data, symptoms, comorbidities, intubation and mortality rates, and treatment options. Regarding early complications, unilateral pneumonia was more common in the variant (−) group (P = .019), whereas bilateral pneumonia was more common in the variant (+) group (P < .001). Regarding late complications, only cytomegalovirus pneumonia was observed more frequently in the variant (−) group (P = .023), whereas secondary gram (+) infection, pulmonary fibrosis (P = .048), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (P = .017), and septic shock (P = .051) were more common in the variant (+) group. The therapeutic approach showed significant differences in the second group such as plasma exchange and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation which is more commonly used in the variant (+) group. Although mortality and intubation rates did not differ between the groups, severe challenging early and late complications were observed mainly in the variant (+) group, necessitating invasive treatment options. We hope that our data from the pandemic will shed light on this field. Regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, it is clear that there is much to be done to deal with future pandemics.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams and Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/MD.0000000000033132en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectComplicationsen_US
dc.subjectCoronavirus disease 19en_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19 variantsen_US
dc.subjectMortalityen_US
dc.subjectSARS-CoV-2en_US
dc.titleDoes the variant positivity and negativity affect the clinical course in COVID-19?: a cohort studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.authoridSüleyman Hilmi Aksoy / 0000-0002-2356-0268en_US
dc.authoridRamazan Gözüküçük / 0000-0002-8205-4752en_US
dc.departmentMeslek Yüksekokulları, Meslek Yüksekokulu, Tıbbi Görüntüleme Teknikleri Programıen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorAksoy, Süleyman Hilmi
dc.contributor.institutionauthorGözüküçük, Ramazan
dc.identifier.volume102en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.endpage8en_US
dc.relation.journalMedicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster