Is YouTube a reliable source for athletic taping?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorUsgu, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorKudaş, Savaş
dc.contributor.authorTaka, Özgür
dc.contributor.authorYakut, Yavuz
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-05T13:01:09Z
dc.date.available2021-08-05T13:01:09Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentFakülteler, Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi, Antrenörlük Eğitimi Bölümü
dc.description.abstractBackground Taping has a critical role in athlete health. Aims To evaluate the quality, characteristics and reliability of the most viewed taping videos in YouTube. Methods Uploaded videos were searched with “athletic taping” and “rigid taping” keywords in YouTube. The educational content quality of the videos was assessed using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), and reliability was evaluated using the Journal American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria. Video uploaders (source) were divided into three groups (physiotherapists (PT), athletic trainers (AT) and non-PT/AT) and compared in terms of video quality, reliability and characteristics. Results 82 videos were included in the study. The mean JAMA score of the videos was 2.91±0.89 and GQS score was 4.06±0.87. A signifcant diference was found among video uploading groups base on days since upload, number of views, daily views, dislikes, like ratio, and JAMA and GQS scores (p<0.05). Less number of days since upload was found for AT videos versus PT and non-PT/AT videos (p=0.007, p=0.007). The number of views and daily views were higher for PT videos than AT videos (p=0.004, p=0.017). The number of dislikes was also higher for PT videos compared to AT videos (p=0.017), with no signifcant diference versus non-PT/AT group (p<0.05). Non-PT/AT videos showed a greater like ratio than PT videos (p=0.022). PT videos had higher JAMA and GQS scores compared to AT and non-PT/AT videos (p=0.001 vs. p=0.001, p=0.010 vs. p=0.001). Conclusion YouTube can be regarded as a useful platform that provides high quality and reliable videos on athletic taping. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifer: This study does not include any human participants or animals.
dc.identifier.citationUsgu, S., Kudaş, S., Taka, Ö., & Yakut, Y. (2021). Is YouTube a reliable source for athletic taping?. Sport Sciences for Health, 1-7.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11332-021-00798-9
dc.identifier.issn1824-7490
dc.identifier.issn1825-1234
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85108946415
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12941/41
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11332-021-00798-9
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000771137600026
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.institutionauthorKudaş, Savaş
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.relation.ispartofSport Sciences for Health
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectTaping
dc.subjectAthletes
dc.subjectYouTube
dc.subjectSource
dc.subjecte-health
dc.titleIs YouTube a reliable source for athletic taping?
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
kudas-is- youtube.pdf
Boyut:
762.53 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Antrenörlük Eğitimi Bölümü Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu