Three-year clinical performance of direct restorations using low-shrinkage Giomer vs. nano-hybrid resin composite

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorToz-Akalın, Tugba
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk-Bozkurt, Funda
dc.contributor.authorKusdemir, Mahmut
dc.contributor.authorÖzsoy, Alev
dc.contributor.authorYüzbaşıoğlu, Emir
dc.contributor.authorÖzcan, Mutlu
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-03T14:28:13Z
dc.date.available2025-01-03T14:28:13Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentFakülteler, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümü
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this investigation was to compare the clinical performance of a nano-hybrid resin composite and a low-shrinkage Giomer resin composite. Material and methods: In total, 35 pairs of restorations were performed using either low-shrinkage Giomer (Beautifil II LS, Shofu Inc.) or nano-hybrid (Clearfil Majesty Posterior) resin composite in 35 patients by two operators using the relevant adhesives, i.e., FL-Bond II (Shofu Inc.) and Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray), with the self-etching technique according to each manufacturer's instructions. Two clinicians assessed the restorations 2 weeks (baseline); 6 months; and 1, 2, and 3 years after the restorative procedures using FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria (Scores 1–5). Data were analyzed using the marginal homogeneity and McNemar tests. The survival rate was calculated using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and the survival of the two groups was compared with the log-rank test (p = 0.05). Results: The mean observation period was 37.7 ± 6.8 months. All restorations completed their 3-year follow-up. The criteria were mainly rated with high (1 or 2) scores for quality in both groups. Only one restoration in the low-shrinkage Giomer resin composite group was accepted as a failure at the 2-year recall due to retention loss. Conclusion: At the 3-year follow-up, the performance of the restorations using the Giomer and the nano-hybrid resin composite were similar and clinically acceptable. Clinical relevance: The low-shrinkage Giomer resin composite exhibited a similar clinical performance to the nano-hybrid resin composite after 3 years in service with both materials displaying minor surface deteriorations at the 3-year recall. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT02823769.
dc.identifier.citationToz-Akalin T, Öztürk-Bozkurt F, Kusdemir M, Özsoy A, Yüzbaşıoğlu E and Özcan M (2024) Three-year clinical performance of direct restorations using low-shrinkage Giomer vs. nano-hybrid resin composite. Front. Dent. Med 5:1459473. doi: 10.3389/fdmed.2024.1459473
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fdmed.2024.1459473
dc.identifier.endpage11
dc.identifier.issn2673-4915
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85207464472
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12941/275
dc.identifier.volume5
dc.identifier.wos001337980700001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.institutionauthorYüzbaşıoğlu, Emir
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFrontiers Media SA
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Dental Medicine
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectClinical study
dc.subjectDental materials
dc.subjectGiomer
dc.subjectMulti-ions
dc.subjectNano-hybrid resin composite
dc.subjectS-PRG filler
dc.subjectSurvival
dc.titleThree-year clinical performance of direct restorations using low-shrinkage Giomer vs. nano-hybrid resin composite
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
Three-year clinical performance of direct restorations using low-shrinkage Giomer vs. nano-hybrid resin composite.pdf
Boyut:
6.31 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.17 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Klinik Bilimler Bölümü Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu