Comparison of different methods used in the classification of maxillary gingival phenotype: A diagnostic accuracy study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorGuliyev, Rasul
dc.contributor.authorLütfioğlu, Müge
dc.contributor.authorKeskiner, İlker
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-26T06:44:48Z
dc.date.available2024-08-26T06:44:48Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentFakülteler, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümü
dc.description.abstractAims: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and applicability of novel methods for determining gingival phenotypes and compare them with currently recommended methods. Methods: Six maxillary anterior teeth from 50 systemically and periodontally healthy patients were evaluated using two conventional methods (periodontal probe translucency method [PP] and transgingival measurement with an endodontic file [EF]), and two novel methods (colored biotype probe translucency method [CBP] and transgingival measurement with a Florida probe [FP]). All data were statistically analyzed. Intra-examiner reproducibility and inter-examiner reproducibility for all methods were analyzed using 10 randomly selected patients who were re-evaluated for each analysis. Results: Moderate agreement was found between EF and PP, with statistically significant differences between median gingival thickness (GT) values for thick 0.8 mm (0.5-1.1 mm) and thin 1 mm (0.6-1.7 mm) phenotypes, and a threshold GT value of <= 0.92 mm (p < .001). FP and PP also showed moderate agreement, with statistically significant differences between median GT values for thick and thin phenotypes (0.80 mm [0.40-1.60 mm] and 0.89 mm [0.40-1.60 mm], respectively), and a threshold GT value of <= 0.8 mm (p < .001). PP and CBP values showed a substantial agreement (p < .001). A statistically significant difference was found between median EF values and CBP categories (p < .001); however, paired comparisons showed that the distinction was applicable only between thin and other phenotypes. Conclusion: Although CBP was found to be successful in detecting the thin phenotype, it was not successful in distinguishing between medium, thick, and very thick phenotypes; moreover, it did not appear to offer any advantages over PP. Although FP may be preferable to EF in measuring gingival thickness, the cost of FP is a disadvantage.
dc.identifier.citationGuliyev, R., Lutfioglu, M., & Keskiner, I. (2024). Comparison of different methods used in the classification of maxillary gingival phenotype: A diagnostic accuracy study. Journal of periodontal research, 10.1111/jre.13334. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.13334en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jre.13334
dc.identifier.endpage10
dc.identifier.issn0022-3484
dc.identifier.issn1600-0765
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85201043734
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12941/226
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001289567800001
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorKeskiner, İlker
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Periodontal Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectDişeti
dc.subjectGingiva
dc.subjectDişeti kalınlığı
dc.subjectGingival thickness
dc.subjectYöntemler
dc.subjectMethods
dc.subjectFenotip
dc.subjectPhenotype
dc.subjectTransgingival sondalama
dc.subjectTransgingival probing
dc.subjectProbun şeffaflığı
dc.subjectTransparency of probe
dc.titleComparison of different methods used in the classification of maxillary gingival phenotype: A diagnostic accuracy study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Comparison of different methods used in the classification.pdf
Boyut:
3.01 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Klinik Bilimler Bölümü Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu